RSoC: Relibc - Wrap up

By jD91mZM2 on


Well, it is nearing my RSoC project end date! Time for me to pack up and never ever contribute to Redox ever again… Just kidding. This isn’t goodbye, you can’t get rid of me that easily I’m afraid. I’ll definitely want to contribute more, can’t however say with certainty how much time I’ll get, for school is approaching, quickly :(

Most importantly I’ll want to continue rebasing mio and tokio and therefor breaking the redox build process with missing git references in the Cargo.lock, until they are upstreamed, and after that I might still need to maintain it because of the policy for adding new platforms. I am a little sad that it’s taking so long to get things merged, but it is a big change and stuff has to be considered.

Actual relibc news

Continuing off from last time, we have a few goals completed:


I’ll need to come back and fix openssl after the project is over, but I’m happy that we got so many things compiling! It shows that relibc isn’t as far off of a reality than I thought. Before I began this project I honestly didn’t think it’d take off anywhere, and definitely not compile redox. But now it does compile redox and even bash inside it!

I’m a little annoyed by relibc’ use of cbindgen, even though it’s nice having the headers be automatically generated, it’s a little backwards since we should write functions that adapt to them, not the other way around. It also forces us to make one sub-crate per header, which leads to a lot of noise, and even worse, causes a large pile of issues with recursive dependencies that are worked around by linking in an old C fashion.

More-over, it’s not clear what relibc’s safety story is. Some relibc functions are implemented safely. Some use safe Rust things, like slices, but in an unsafe way. Some just use unsafe things like raw pointers directly. I lean towards the latter when writing personally, because it is faster to be unsafe and don’t look up the length first. But I’d very much like to see one day where the only unsafety in relibc is wrappers around inner, safe, functions. This unfortunately doesn’t make a lot of sense for platform-specific functions because Linux does require pointers and stuff, so having a safety wrapper is just redundant. It also requires us to restructure it a lot if we want to keep things clean.